Following the collapse of the world economy triggered by the sub-prime crisis; European countries emerged in the international market as potential targets for investments. The European and English currencies lost much of their relative value against the US currency making them more affordable to foreign investors. With this unique economic situation in mind, investors from around the world have found a new home: Europe.
One European country that is an obvious spot for investment is Spain. The ultimately dry climate plus all year round sunshine are great for sporting and other outdoor activities. Buying a property in Spain is indeed a sound idea as the prices locally fell sharply and even more so relatively to the US dollars. Spain also has benefited from a large growth for the last 10 years thus has good infrastructure and will offer great returns when the economy rebounds. Great bargains can be found where prices have dropped and demand for great holiday lets will un-doubtfully pick up when the European economies recovers and tourists flood again to the warm and sunny Spain.
United Kingdom and more specifically England may also offer great opportunities for wise property investors. Property prices have started to pick up in 2010 as the local economy started a small recovery. Supply of properties is still low as builders delayed new projects due to lack of funding from struggling banks and historically strong demand for new properties is preventing the price from falling. Assuming that the economy recovers in 2011 prices will rapidly rise again; savvy property buyers should actively seek to invest while prices are still rising slowly.
There are a number of people in today’s market that are looking to put their money to work in more ways than one. Sure you can invest in the stock market like every other person out there or just buy an annuity that will give you a steady stream of income. Or you can invest in the real estate market that is just filled with more properties than anyone has ever seen. Because of the persistent presence of bank foreclosures, the real estate market has many amazing deals. This type of investment is not for the faint of heart, since your money may be tied up for months to years. There are a few ways you can invest in real estate that will make you money. The most recognizable way that people have made money was buying homes to flip in the short term. The other option is to hold them as rental properties for a few years while it is rented out for a steady stream of income. If you are looking into flipping homes you need to have expert knowledge of the area to make sure you are buying it at a price that will make you money. You also must consider the money needed to update the home so that it will sell quickly. As a general rule the nicer the home looks compared to others on the market the faster it will sell. However the investor must be careful not to put too much money into the home where he has no chance of recouping that upgrade. For example putting in a pool will cost more than you will get when you go to sell it. It might look great but items such as pools will not return the investment required to put it in. The goal in these types of investments is to buy and sell as many houses as you can. You need to find the right people who will help you achieve this goal such as local contractors and Realtors. They will be the key to helping you find the property, fixing it at the best price and then putting it back on the market.
The other type of real estate investing that is going on these days is to buy and hold as a rental property. There are many condos and smaller homes on the market that make great rentals. These can be so cheap that in a few years your entire investment has been paid off by your tenant. You still have to do your research and know the area before you buy. Making sure that your condo is in a safe part of town with stable employment is very important. If the tenant loses a job the faster he or she finds a new one the better off everyone is. Also knowing the area rents give you an idea of what your monthly income will be from your investment. With this monthly cash flow coming in you can even take part of it and trade the currency markets. With the help of forex trading charts you can take that monthly rent and double it. This is not to say that you might want to spend it on a vacation for you and your wife, but a forex position is a good way to hedge against your real estate holdings.
You can also buy real estate because you feel as if renting is giving your money away. This is very true. While renting you are not building wealth and only paying the owner of the property to go on vacation and play on his boat. Once you become a home owner you have that feeling of accomplishment knowing that you own a home. You don’t have to worry about a security deposit or wondering if your landlord will ask you to replace the carpets. The entire home is yours and you are free to do whatever you want to it. After all owning your own home is considered the American dream, and in today’s market you can buy that dream for a lot less than in the past.
Buying opportunities, for those looking for bargain deals, are still good and should extend well into 2010 and 2011. Housing starts according to the Commerce Dept. have come in lower than expected for 2009.
One would naturally think, as home builders attempt to reduce inventory, that home prices would stabilize. To a certain extent they have stabilized albeit temporary.
First time home buyers who have been sitting on fences, automobiles and motorbikes are now out in force trying to take advantage of the $8,000 tax credit set forth by the U.S. government. Ironically, the tax credit is due to expire on November 30'th. This small flood of home buyers has temporarily created a high demand in low to middle income housing which in turn has created more competition among investors seeking cheap deals on foreclosures and HUD homes.
Over the past 12 months my partners and I have been buying single family home foreclosures. Homes are selling for deep discounts and providing high cash-flow rates once rented. Our strategy is not to buy and flip, but to buy, rehab then rent to provide cash-flow and capital appreciation. On the surface this may seem as easy as drinking coffee because of the high number of foreclosures available. But don't be fooled with high quantity and low prices. Buying foreclosure properties is not as easy as it may seem. Buying houses for cash has been our strategy which is one way to up your chances of success. Refer to my previous article "Buying Real Estate With All-Cash" In todays article I'll outline another strategy that when paired with all-cash works for us.
Relieving Some of the Burden
Buying homes at deep discounts for cash relieves vacancy pressure as there is no unerlying mortgage. You may still have a lean on the property held by a private lender but hopefully you have worked out the terms so that you have 60-90 days until your first interest payment. Racing out to find a tenant before your first payment is no longer a pressing issue. You can be more choosy when screening tenants. You can hold closer to your asking rent price and not decrease it just to get the property occupied. You can save money by performing more of the rehab yourself. These are just a few of the benefits.
The Problem With Real Estate Agents
As easy as it might seem to buy real estate at low prices, a problem has arrisen that must be addressed if we are to successfully close deals with banks. I have found, as with many of my collegues that seller real estate agents have all the control when it comes to you submitting your offer, deciphering which offers to submit, how much information they tell you ahead of time, and lets face it some blatently do nothing. As a buyer in the past I have typically used a buying real estate agent to help me track down candidate properties, perform showings and leg work. As a result I did not close many deals dispite offering near or above asking price. The reason...
In an up and down market there are those investors that will dig up opportunities regardless of the state of the economy. In the current climate banks are holding on to their cash with a wait and see attitude. Savvy investors are finding that buying with "All-cash" works as a viable strategy for acquiring residential and commercial bank owned properties. Investors with a wait and see attitude for institutional lending and financing are missing a great opportunity to buy while everything is on sale. Rock bottom prices in the residential and commercial markets in part have been driven down by the scarce availability of credit.
A Hostile Lending Environment
Currently, savings and loan banks, an alternative to commercial lending institutions and private lenders, will typically finance up to 65-70% percent of property values. Buyers in some cases are required to bring 30-35% to the closing table to even be considered. The Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (CMBS) market which has traditionally produced many lenders eager to compete for loans has been stalled since the 4'th quarter of 2007. For example: In the first 3 quarters of 2008 only $12 to $13 billion worth of commercial loans were securitized. Already, 2009 is on its way to having the lowest production of securitized commercial loans in 10 years as stated by Commercial Real Estate Direct. Some banks, in order to finace a new project, are requiring developers to pre-lease roughly 70 percent of office/retail units and housing. Shorter amortization periods and higher interest rates added to the mix creates the perfect storm for an even more hostile lending environment.
Although Wall Street seems to have rebounded in recent days in response to the Congressional approval of the $700 billion financial-system bailout last week, there seems to be continued concerns found amongst financial professionals, who are concerned with the continued pall of recession over the American economy. The main concern remains focused on government ownership of the American banking system. Will this end the market's paralysis or is it just another bad idea from a failed administration?
Let's face it the average American person does not concern himself or herself with the goings on of Wall Street. Until recently this just did not impact their lives unless they were savvy investors. The average American mainly concerns themselves with the bankers that lend the money out. We are a credit minded country. So now what to do when the credit market folds? Banks have had no choice but to limit the amount of credit that can open for people but also the guidelines for credit lending have tightened incredibly so. The subprime market, once open for business is no longer available. What else has happened for the banks is the widening spread, or surcharge, that banks must impose on short-term loans to other banks. This has increased over the last year from 0.65% above the cost of funds to an exorbitant 4%.
While the symptoms of the economic crisis and virtual breakdown have been evident for quite some time, since the market became deregulated in 1999 and allowed less government regulation, the current prognosis remains unseen even by the country's foremost financial experts. Many can play the blame game like a pro and point the finger at bipartisan investments in the mortgage industry, specifically the borderline predatory lending practices found in the subprime market. This was all very hush-hush, as this knowledge was not readily shared with the common everyday investor.
During this time of financial uncertainty as giant powerful cornerstones of the American banking community fail, you have to wonder, is my money safe? What happens if my bank is no longer doing business? Should I take my money out? What about small, regional banks and even credit unions? Are they immune or will they suffer the same fate? Should I worry about my long-term investments? Is it finally time to get organized and figure out my finances?
For months now, the American financial backbone has been a sinking ship, headed toward a crisis beyond anyone's experience and description because not even the Great Depression can compare. Many say we have been in a recession but there have been signs of a Depression for a while. Even such financial leaders like Bear Stearns, IndyMac bank start to fail and powerhouses like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac need federal assistance; there is something rotten here. This is not to mention the Lehman Brother's bankruptcy and the proposed bailout of $700 billion bailout, which was initiated by American Insurance Group or AIG. No wonder our heads are spinning; we don't know if we are coming or going. Everyday on the news it is something new. People are taking to Internet financial pages like MSN Money and sending emails to financial experts across the country for advice.
Oprah has Suze Orman on her show as a way to elevate the worry but still there are very few answers and still more questions. We can take a moment to answers the questions but you also must keep in mind, the answers are changing for from minute to minute.
How can I tell if my bank will fail? Well you really can't. There's no easy way to know and I'm certain the bank will try to ease your worries. You should look at indications within the market because there is no a hot list of banks going bad. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp does not publish one. Furthermore, according to the American Bankers Association many banks rebound and recover so quickly that it's next to impossible for them to produce a list.
This current talk of financial bailout suggests that as a result mortgage rates will fall allowing a surge in home buying especially for first time buyers. Still one must wonder how long this will last but also what are the long-term impacts for the housing market? Right now it feels like the lending industry is distressed but this may not be true for very long. The banks at risk of failing just need to time to recover and it will actually be consumer confidence that drive the economy back to being fruitful again.
There just seems to be a lot flux in the market, organizations don't know if they are coming or going. This is a period of acquisition and consolidation. Lehman Brother's is on the auction block, AIG's failure has brought the issue of bailout into the limelight and Bank of America, of course, will remain standing, buying up new pieces for their vast umbrella like Merrill Lynch. This week has been historic and shocking for the experts even to say, they don't know what should happen. That's tough. While so many people grasp this concept, many are putting their ducks in row and wonder if this is a right time to even think about buying a home or new car. I believe people are hesitant this week but this will change once there is direction and leadership toward resolution. This is what some experts have to say about the future of home buying:
How does the latest fallout from Wall Street influence mortgage lending rates? Well, let's take a look. We can only hope. In the interim rates will more than likely go down because there is a lot shuffling going as the dust settles and investors look for safety nets in this uncertain market. Upon many experts advise, this is a time to put our money in real estate investment or income property. As of last week the 10-year notes went down which means that the yield also decrease but this makes for new opportunities. Experts expect mortgage rates to follow this trend because historically they usually follow suit. Expect rates to drop further as more news brakes. Just within the last week Bankrate.com commented that the 30-year fixed rate was 5.78% down from 6.08% of the previous week. Just to compare, this rate was 6.5% in August.
For a while now, many can spectulate the trouble started at the tail end of 2006 with the mortgage industry busy, the American economy has been struggling, facing uncertain times. Many understand the historic significance of last week but the implications of a federal bailout has yet to hit home. With the annoucement that the Federal Reserve will aid the ailing AIG with an $85 billion rescue package, the details seem murkey as more politicians throw in his or her two cents of how this bailout will work and impact the economy. While the bailout does not favor AIG, the company must hand over 80 percent control of the organization's future business dealings, this new bailout and the status of future bailouts remains in the balance and hands of the federal government who stepped into save the mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac not too long ago with a $100 billion package. Where this differs and many fail to see a need to save AIG is that Fannie and Freddie were already government controlled and sponsored by federal dollars. Why should the federal government step in and save a stockholder owned company? What I am trying to say is that this bailout of finance giants has been a popular trend, starting with a $30 billion loan to Bear Stearns in February. It is a trend we will see more of and possibly a part of the Federal Reserve's strategy to save the American economy. I believe many who are struggling to make ends meet, living pay check to pay check, the working class and even the upper class, when push comes to shove and with a cold winter on the way, wish that the Federal Reserve would give the American people a loan. That $300 incentive check just did not cut it.
While AIG must pay the Federal government back or risk losing control of its interests, many are concerned with the level of government involvement and bascially, the bottom line, who really will be paying for the bailouts? Is Washington really to blame for this mess? What about corporate accountability and the management of these organizations? Something is rotten in Denmark as Shakespeare wrote in Hamlet. Really it does not add up. It is cause to worry of how this can be avoided in the future but also how this will impact the American people over the years to come. Many will argue that this has been a long time coming that part of the issue has been a faillure to tighten lending practices and that the subprime market has lead to the downfall of the whole market. Truly companies like Countrywide should have known better instead of living high on the hog. We could have avoided a lot of trouble today with bad loans.
So should the federal government step in and save companies riddled by bad behavior in the market place? This whole crisis begins and ends with the practice of predatory lending and we've known it since before the mortgage buble burst. As said above, not only Countrywide but other banks allowed their lending practices to be too flexible allowing many under qualified borrowers to purchase items like homes and cars. Many brokers pushed such products on people who otherwise should not have been buying in the first place. Many did not look at the full picture and mainly the issue of repayment. Now the market is suffering due to underperforming loans or bad loans. Still the bank is at fault, they should have never allowed such practices to continue but they were leveraging on the risk involved as long as the portfolio was performing well, the bank was making money on subprime products. Now the current situation prevents this demographic of people with blemished credit from establishing any credit and only the prime customers (A & B paper) will prevail. Many will have to learn to live without or forget about keeping up with the Jones because there will just not be any loans out there for these customers. It is unfortnate because this takes aways from sales people's commission salaries and many people of these professional will be out of work. Truly this is why so many people have never believed in the concept of credit in the first place. It creates a vicious cycle.
Although Wall Street seems to have rebounded in recent days in response to the Congressional approval of the $700 billion financial-system bailout last week, there seems to be continued concerns found amongst financial professionals, who are concerned with the continued pall of recession over the American economy. The main concern remains focused on government ownership of the American banking system. Will this end the market's paralysis or is it just another bad idea from a failed administration?
For months now, the American financial backbone has been a sinking ship, headed toward a crisis beyond anyone's experience and description because not even the Great Depression can compare. Many say we have been in a recession but there have been signs of a Depression for a while. Even such financial leaders like Bear Stearns, IndyMac bank start to fail and powerhouses like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac need federal assistance; there is something rotten here. This is not to mention the Lehman Brother's bankruptcy and the proposed bailout of $700 billion bailout, which was initiated by American Insurance Group or AIG. No wonder our heads are spinning; we don't know if we are coming or going. Everyday on the news it is something new. People are taking to Internet financial pages like MSN Money and sending emails to financial experts across the country for advice. 
This current talk of financial bailout suggests that as a result mortgage rates will fall allowing a surge in home buying especially for first time buyers. Still one must wonder how long this will last but also what are the long-term impacts for the housing market? Right now it feels like the lending industry is distressed but this may not be true for very long. The banks at risk of failing just need to time to recover and it will actually be consumer confidence that drive the economy back to being fruitful again.
For a while now, many can spectulate the trouble started at the tail end of 2006 with the mortgage industry busy, the American economy has been struggling, facing uncertain times. Many understand the historic significance of last week but the implications of a federal bailout has yet to hit home. With the annoucement that the Federal Reserve will aid the ailing AIG with an $85 billion rescue package, the details seem murkey as more politicians throw in his or her two cents of how this bailout will work and impact the economy. While the bailout does not favor AIG, the company must hand over 80 percent control of the organization's future business dealings, this new bailout and the status of future bailouts remains in the balance and hands of the federal government who stepped into save the mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac not too long ago with a $100 billion package. Where this differs and many fail to see a need to save AIG is that Fannie and Freddie were already government controlled and sponsored by federal dollars. Why should the federal government step in and save a stockholder owned company? What I am trying to say is that this bailout of finance giants has been a popular trend, starting with a $30 billion loan to Bear Stearns in February. It is a trend we will see more of and possibly a part of the Federal Reserve's strategy to save the American economy. I believe many who are struggling to make ends meet, living pay check to pay check, the working class and even the upper class, when push comes to shove and with a cold winter on the way, wish that the Federal Reserve would give the American people a loan. That $300 incentive check just did not cut it.
